All throughout the "O" Dictatorship the Government has encouraged and bribed many American Religious organizations to help "O" in his efforts to bring more muslim immigrants to the US. The irony is that these religious groups say they are acting out of Christian beliefs to help others. However, there is little evidence that they have helped the most repressed, tortured and victimized group, fellow Christians. The monthly "Voice of the Martyrs" details thousands of atrocities the majority muslim population of the middle east have committed against the minority Christian population. Rape, torture, slaughter of women and children, and sexual slavery of hundreds of thousands of Christian women has been the fate of Believers ever since "O" supported and praised " Arab Spring".
I urge everyone reading this to sign up with https://www.numbersusa.com This site provides information and an Action Board filled with issues of the day. They do all the work for you in contacting your Representatives by providing pre-written letters, memos, Twitter text for you with just a few point and click actions on your part. They provide lots of information on the out of control immigration issues we face. They give you facts and figures on real immigration numbers and keep you up to date on the stealth invasion by the muslim world. This was a president set by muhammad himself when he could win a battle against his opponents he simply sent his people into the adversary's camp, populated them with the rapid growing muslim family and took over as the majority. They call this the HIJRAH which he used in 622 AD to kick off his plans to take over the entire globe and SUBJUGATE the entire global population under islam.
[Here is an excerpt from Numbers USA showing how they are using our own religious freedom to foster their HIJRAH here in America] :
RELIGIOUS LOBBY
In general, Religious Globalists believe that the needs of people in the Third World have priority over the needs of people in more advanced nations when it comes to questions of whether migrants should cross borders. Underlying this is the assessment that most would-be immigrants come from conditions that are worse than those for the Americans who may be hurt by their entry.
Powerful appeals for a version of open borders have come in recent years from some high-profile religious leaders who say that although a country has a right to control its borders, workers without jobs have a higher right to cross the borders in search of work. That would qualify hundreds of millions of people around the world to immigrate. Many open-immigration globalists contend that borders and communities are barriers to a just world; any person anywhere in the world should be allowed to go anywhere else in the world if that will advance that person's well-being -- even if it creates a decline of the well-being of residents of the receiving community.The justice of this is based primarily on the assumption that migrants would not move into a community unless the conditions there were better. Therefore, residents of that community can lose some of their standard of living and still not be worse off than the arriving migrant. Global egalitarianism appears to be the goal.
In the end in a democracy, a decision on immigration ought to be made in answer to the question, "What is the right thing to do?"
The ethics of closed-immigration are based primarily on the belief that a country's ethical priority is to its own citizens. To the extent it has ethical obligations to other people, a country should help those people where they reside, not by bringing them into the country and posing harm to its own citizens. Some closed-immigration advocates feel little obligation to helping impoverished peoples in other countries, while other closed-immigration advocates are extremely active in international religious ministries and relief and development efforts in poor countries. But people of this philosophy do not see immigration as being necessary for individuals or nations to show compassion for people in other lands.
Closed-immigration advocates note that the same religions with teachings about the brotherhood and sisterhood of all humankind also include teachings about the creation of just societies based on mutually held responsibilities within the family, tribe or nation. Supporters of closed borders
point to what they see as substantial agreement among history's philosophers that a person's moral obligations are greatest for those persons who are closest to them, and to their own descendants. Vanderbilt University philosopher John Lachs has noted that, "Throughout history, acting in self-interest for one's own people generally has not been considered morally selfish."
point to what they see as substantial agreement among history's philosophers that a person's moral obligations are greatest for those persons who are closest to them, and to their own descendants. Vanderbilt University philosopher John Lachs has noted that, "Throughout history, acting in self-interest for one's own people generally has not been considered morally selfish."
Here is an article showing how deeply certain religious organizations have partnered with the "O" regime to support the influx of immigrants both legal and illegal.:
Get involved in stopping the invasion that has as its goal the conquering of your American Nation.
One other tactic the muslims are using this "Blueprint for Cultural Jihad". :
Wake up America and take action. the EU has been either sleeping through the "muslim invasion" or worse taking action like religious groups here and foolishly accepting them with open arms.
